Outreach
Bringing the Ocean to Society
7 Nov 2019
Sustainable fisheries: commitments are important but cannot replace laws and institutions
Check out the outcomes of the analysis made by IMR on 182 Our Ocean commitments.

EurOcean Member Institute of Marine Research (IMR) has analyzed 182 Our Ocean commitments from the past five years. Overall, the commitments have mainly generated attention and funding while the direct impact on sustainable fisheries and management is less obvious.      

Useful supplements  

First and foremost, the effort has generated attention to the issue and funding of projects supportive of sustainable fisheries. Other important components such as science, advice, laws and regulations and strengthening of institutions have less support, the evaluation shows.

In sustainable fisheries management, this kind of commitments cannot replace solid institutions and long-term regulations. They should rather be regarded as useful supplements, says research director Geir Huse at the IMR. He has overseen the report presented at the Our Ocean conference in Oslo. A similar evaluation has already been done for marine protected areas.  

The institutions are important

Many of the commitments address IUU fisheries and the port state measures, says Geir Huse.

"We have documented positive impact from the commitments, but it remains a fact that a lot of important work in fisheries management takes place on a regional scale. That’s why we recommend that the regional fisheries management organizations in particular are empowered" says Geir Huse.      

Selected examples of commitments

• Combating IUU fisheries

• The technology for tuna transparency challenge

• Indigenous rights to fish

• The Marine Stewardship Council

• Sale and purchase

Reference

Geir Huse, Åsmund Bjordal, Harald Loeng, Kari Østervold Toft and Reidar Toresen. "Assesment of commitments on sustainable fisheries to the Our Ocean conferences". Rapport fra havforskningen (2019)  

1

2